Ultrapure Water for Trace Element Analysis in Pharmaceuticals

Anastasia Domanova¹, Juhani Virkanen², Glenn Woods³, Stephane Mabic¹

¹Lab Water Solutions, MilliporeSigma, Guyancourt, France, ²University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, ³Agilent Technologies Ltd, Stockport, UK

This paper discusses how reagent water quality can impact the results of trace element analyses in the pharmaceutical industry. The suitability of fresh ultrapure water produced using Milli-Q^® water purification systems for ICP-OES and ICP-MS trace element analyses is demonstrated.

Read more about 

• Monitoring of Trace Elements in the Pharmaceutical Industry
• Suitability of Ultrapure Water for Trace Element Analyses 
  
• ICP-MS Experimental Conditions
• Benefits of Ultrapure Water for Trace Element Analyses
• Related Products

Monitoring of Trace Elements in the Pharmaceutical Industry

In the pharmaceutical industry, it is absolutely crucial to monitor and control trace elements at all stages of development and production. This is explained by three major reasons:

• Metals and metalloids are used as reagents and catalysts in the synthetic processing of raw materials, intermediates and active pharmaceuticals ingredients, as well as in the formulation and manufacturing of products. It is therefore important to ensure that medicinal products do not contain toxic metal contaminants at concentrations that could be detrimental for human health.
  
  
• For certain customers and authorities, it is important that products, such as multi-vitamins or metal-based drugs, contain elements they are purported to contain and at levels reported on the packaging.
  
  
• Metals can be introduced into pharmaceutical products unintentionally through contaminated reagents or when products are in contact with metal surfaces during development or production processes. Moreover, metals can find their way into a product from packaging. Thus, the material of containers used to store products must be evaluated for the trace element leachables and extractables.

Analytical Techniques: from AAS to ICP

Flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) have, until recently, been the first choice of analytical chemists for trace element analyses. Today, these techniques are frequently being replaced by modern, more sophisticated instrumentation, such as inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES).¹ The use of this instrumentation is encouraged by the United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) as they allow rapid, specific and reliable multi-element analyses of a variety of sample types.²  ICP is characterized by high sensitivity and established, strict requirements for the quality of experimental reagents. Indeed, reagents of very high quality must be selected to optimize ICP-MS or ICP-OES instrument performance.

Water Requirements for Trace Element Analyses

In ICP-MS or ICP-OES trace element analyses, ultrapure water is used extensively. It is used for direct dilution during sample and standard preparation, as a reagent blank, and for instrument and sample container cleaning (Figure 1).  Any contamination, and in this particular case, trace element contamination, introduced during sample preparation will carry throughout analysis and affect the final results. Therefore, water selected for trace elemental analyses must be of very high and consistent quality and should not contaminate samples or the analytical instrument  with elements.³

In the pharmaceutical industry, the choice of water quality is dictated by its intended use.⁴ However, water selected as an analytical reagent must not only comply with specific pharmacopeial standards, but must also meet the requirements of modern analytical instrumentation to ensure the success of any trace element analysis.

Milli-Q^® ultrapure water purification systems are designed to be compliant* with water quality standards determined in various pharmacopeias. This study evaluates the suitability of fresh  ultrapure water produced using Milli-Q^® ultrapure water purification systems for ICP-MS and ICP-OES trace element analyses.

Figure 1. Uses for ultrapure water in ICP-MS and ICP-OES analysis.

Suitability of Ultrapure Water for Trace Element Analyses

In spite of increased interest from the pharmaceutical industry to analyze trace elements in products and packaging, there is no agreement on which elements should be monitored. The element that is subject to control is completely dependent on the stage of a product’s development or manufacturing process. Therefore, a number of elements were selected based on USP Chapter 2332, the ICH Q3D Guideline for Elemental Impurities⁵ proposed by the EMA for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, as well as various scientific publications.^3,6 In Table 1, background equivalent concentration (BEC) and limit of detection limits (LOD) are demonstrated for each element in ng/L (ppt) level.

Table 1. Element levels in ng/L (ppt) in freshly produced ultrapure water from a Milli-Q^® ultrapure water system, measured under normal laboratory conditions (not in a clean room).

Element	BEC (ppt)	LOD (ppt)	Element	BEC (ppt)	LOD (ppt)	Element	BEC (ppt)	LOD (ppt)
7Li	0.00	0.00	85Rb	0.07	0.14	157Gd	0.18	0.13
9Be	0.24	0.28	88Sr	0.36	0.15	159Tb	0.03	0.03
11B	7.71	1.84	89Y	0.11	0.11	163Dy	0.11	0.08
23Na	17.49	2.72	90Zr	0.47	0.09	165Ho	0.03	0.02
24Mg	13.17	0.52	93Nb	0.23	0.15	166Er	0.10	0.06
27Al	0.47	0.06	95Mo	0.62	0.36	169Tm	0.04	0.03
39K	38.72	0.00	101Ru	0.69	0.19	172Yb	0.14	0.10
40Ca	63.6	2.17	103Rh	0.16	0.26	175Lu	0.03	0.03
45Sc	7.50	1.89	105Pd	0.07	0.06	178Hf	0.12	0.09
49Ti	2.08	2.49	107Ag	0.59	0.11	181Ta	0.15	0.13
51V	0.72	0.39	111Cd	0.06	0.2	182W	0.59	0.40
52Cr	2.10	0.37	115In	0.07	0.06	187Re	0.06	0.03
55Mn	2.64	0.14	118Sn	0.47	0.85	189Os	0.28	0.23
56Fe	0.60	0.19	121Sb	0.06	0.11	193Ir	0.08	0.12
58Ni	0.76	0.18	125Te	3.77	2.61	195Pt	0.29	0.19
59Co	0.30	0.11	133Cs	0.05	0,00	197Au	0.40	0.32
63Cu	0.19	0.11	137Ba	3.9	0.5	202Hg	0.49	0.25
66Zn	14.07	1.17	139La	0.13	0.06	205Tl	0.50	0.21
69Ga	0.02	0.10	141Pr	0.05	0.04	208Pb	1.37	0.33
72Ge	8.05	4.96	146Nd	0.22	0.17	209Bi	0.07	0.08
75As	3.10	0.72	147Sm	0.25	0.18	232Th	0.10	0.08
78Se	1.05	0.91	153Eu	0.05	0.05	238U	0.11	0.05

In the pharmaceutical industry, trace element analyses are performed in the range from mg/L (ppm) to sub- μg/L (sub-ppb), and it is desirable that BEC values of target elements do not exceed the ppt (ng/mL) or sub-ppt range. Moreover, as sensitivity, accuracy, precision and recovery must be appropriately demonstrated during the method validation process, achieving a low and stable detection limit is of high importance. Table 1 shows that certain elements have slightly higher values than sub-ppt, which is explained by contamination coming from the laboratory environment, since the analyses were performed under normal laboratory conditions.⁷ If there is a need to achieve significantly lower levels of elements, it is reasonable to use additional polishing steps, such as a Milli-Q^® IQ Element purification unit which makes it possible to obtain BECs at sub-ppt levels.⁸

ICP-MS Experimental Conditions

Tap water was purified in two steps to obtain ultrapure water:

1. Pure water was obtained from tap water thanks to the combination of intelligent reverse osmosis, Elix^® electrodeionization (EDI), and a bactericidal UV lamp, using a Milli-Q^® system similar to the Milli-Q^® IX pure water system. 
2. Ultrapure water was obtained by further purifying the above water with a Milli-Q^® polishing system, similar to the Milli-Q^® IQ 7000 ultrapure water system, fitted with a Millipak^® final filter. Note, for the analysis of Hg, ultrapure water was obtained from the Milli-Q^® Direct system, which does not contain an Elix^® EDI module.

The ultrapure water samples were analyzed as follows for levels of:

• Li, Be, B, Na, Mg, Al, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Ni, Co, Cu, As, Se, Sr, Mo, Pd, Ag, Cd, Sn, Sb, Cs, Ba, Tl, Pb, Th and U using an Agilent^® 7700s ICP-MS instrument
• Hg, Sc, Fe, Zn, Ga, Ge, Rb, Y, Zr, Nb, Ru, Rh, In, Te, La, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu, Hf, Ta, W, Re, Os, Ir, Pt, Au and Bi using an Agilent^® 7500s ICP-MS instrument

All experiments were performed under regular laboratory conditions (not in a clean room).

Agilent^® 7700s instrumental details and parameters: PFA-50 nebulizer, PFA spray chamber, sapphire inert torch, quartz 2.5 mm i.d. torch injector, platinum sample and skimmer cone, RF power 600/1600 W, sampling position 12 / 8 mm, carrier gas flow 0.90 L/min, makeup gas flow 0.32 / 0.51 L/min, auto detector mode, calibration through 1, 5, 10, 50 ng/L.

Agilent^® 7500s instrumental details and parameters: quartz nebulizer, quartz spray chamber, quartz i.d. torch injector, nickel sample and skimmer cone, RF power 1300 / 1550 W, sampling position 8 mm, carrier gas flow 0.96 L/min, makeup gas flow 0.23 L/min, auto detector mode, calibration through 1, 20, 50, 100 ng/L.

Containers were all PFA pre-cleaned with ultrapure water. All ultrapure water samples (resistivity of 18.2 MΩ·cm and TOC below 5 ppb) from Milli-Q^® water purification systems were analyzed immediately after water collection.

Benefits of Ultrapure Water for Trace Element Analyses

This study demonstrated that ultrapure water produced by a Milli-Q^® water purification system contains low ppt levels of trace elements. Therefore, laboratories in the pharmaceutical industry that perform trace element analysis can rely on Milli-Q^® ultrapure water systems to produce high-purity water that meets their stringent requirements. Choosing ultrapure water produced from a Milli-Q^® system for trace element analyses will help to ensure the generation of high quality data.

References

1. Nageswara Rao R, Kumar Talluri M. 2007. An overview of recent applications of inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) in determination of inorganic impurities in drugs and pharmaceuticals. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 43(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2006.07.004

2. 2013. USP, Chapter 233, Elemental Impurities - Procedures.. https://doi.org/10.31003/uspnf_m5193_02_01

3. Lewen N. 2011. The use of atomic spectroscopy in the pharmaceutical industry for the determination of trace elements in pharmaceuticals. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 55(4):653-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2010.11.030

4. USP, Chapter 1231, Water for Pharmaceutical Purposes.. https://doi.org/10.31003/uspnf_m99956_07_01

5. Implementation strategy of ICH Q3D guideline. [Internet]. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/implementation-strategy-ich-q3d-guideline_en.pdf

6. Abernethy DR, DeStefano AJ, Cecil TL, Zaidi K, Williams RL. 2010. Metal Impurities in Food and Drugs. Pharm Res. 27(5):750-755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-010-0080-3

7. Rodushkin I, Engström E, Baxter DC. 2010. Sources of contamination and remedial strategies in the multi-elemental trace analysis laboratory. Anal Bioanal Chem. 396(1):365-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-3087-z

8. Ultrapure water tailored for trace elemental analyses. Datasheet.