Skip to Content
MilliporeSigma
All Photos(2)

Key Documents

GF96162037

Lead

foil, not light tested, 25x25mm, thickness 0.02mm, 99.99+%

Synonym(s):

Lead, PB000150

Sign Into View Organizational & Contract Pricing


About This Item

Empirical Formula (Hill Notation):
Pb
CAS Number:
Molecular Weight:
207.20
MDL number:
UNSPSC Code:
12141723
PubChem Substance ID:
NACRES:
NA.23

assay

≥99.99%

form

foil

manufacturer/tradename

Goodfellow 961-620-37

resistivity

20.65 μΩ-cm

bp

1740 °C (lit.)

mp

327.4 °C (lit.)

SMILES string

[Pb]

InChI

1S/Pb

InChI key

WABPQHHGFIMREM-UHFFFAOYSA-N

General description

For updated SDS information please visit www.goodfellow.com.

Legal Information

Product of Goodfellow

pictograms

Health hazardEnvironment

signalword

Danger

Hazard Classifications

Aquatic Acute 1 - Aquatic Chronic 1 - Lact. - Repr. 1A - STOT RE 1 Oral

target_organs

Central nervous system,Blood,Immune system,Kidney

Storage Class

6.1C - Combustible acute toxic Cat.3 / toxic compounds or compounds which causing chronic effects

wgk_germany

nwg

flash_point_f

Not applicable

flash_point_c

Not applicable


Certificates of Analysis (COA)

Search for Certificates of Analysis (COA) by entering the products Lot/Batch Number. Lot and Batch Numbers can be found on a product’s label following the words ‘Lot’ or ‘Batch’.

Already Own This Product?

Find documentation for the products that you have recently purchased in the Document Library.

Visit the Document Library

X A Li et al.
Medical physics, 26(7), 1245-1251 (1999-08-06)
The purpose of this work is to study the dose enhancement by a thin foil (thickness of 0.2-4 mm) of high-Z material in a water phantom, irradiated by high-energy photon beams. EGS4 Monte Carlo technique was used. Perturbations on the
I Sewerin
Tandlaegebladet, 94(12), 483-486 (1990-09-01)
The lead foil of dental x-ray film packets may cause a number of artifacts; especially well known are the "tractor treads" and "herringbone patterns" following a backward filmpositioning in the patient's mouth. In the present paper a specific and seldomly
George X Ding
Medical physics, 29(11), 2459-2463 (2002-12-05)
This study investigates a possible cause of reported significant dose discrepancies between Monte Carlo calculations and measurements in the buildup region for high-energy photon beams in large fields. A proposed hypothesis was that the discrepancy was caused by a source
A Janhom et al.
Dento maxillo facial radiology, 29(1), 20-27 (2000-02-02)
To determine the interaction between image noise and file compression, with special emphasis on the accuracy of caries diagnosis. Fifty-nine bitewing radiographs of patients were taken simultaneously with Ektaspeed Plus (Eastman-Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA) film without lead foil and the
Antonio Lopez Medina et al.
Physics in medicine and biology, 49(1), 17-32 (2004-02-20)
Two dosimetry protocols based on absorbed dose to water have recently been implemented: TG-51 and TRS-398. These protocols use different beam-quality indices: %dd(10)x and TPR20,10. The effect of electron contamination in measurements of %dd(10)x has been proposed as a disadvantage

Our team of scientists has experience in all areas of research including Life Science, Material Science, Chemical Synthesis, Chromatography, Analytical and many others.

Contact Technical Service