Skip to Content
MilliporeSigma
  • Cell-based therapies for experimental chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cell-based therapies for experimental chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Disease models & mechanisms (2015-01-31)
Diana A Papazova, Nynke R Oosterhuis, Hendrik Gremmels, Arianne van Koppen, Jaap A Joles, Marianne C Verhaar
ABSTRACT

Cell-based therapy is a promising strategy for treating chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is currently the focus of preclinical studies. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of cell-based therapy in preclinical (animal) studies of CKD, and determined factors affecting cell-based therapy efficacy in order to guide future clinical trials. In total, 71 articles met the inclusion criteria. Standardised mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for outcome parameters including plasma urea, plasma creatinine, urinary protein, blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate, glomerulosclerosis and interstitial fibrosis. Sub-analysis for each outcome measure was performed for model-related factors (species, gender, model and timing of therapy) and cell-related factors (cell type, condition and origin, administration route and regime of therapy). Overall, meta-analysis showed that cell-based therapy reduced the development and progression of CKD. This was most prominent for urinary protein (SMD, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.00-1.68) and urea (1.09; 0.66-1.51), both P<0.001. Changes in plasma urea were associated with changes in both glomerulosclerosis and interstitial fibrosis. Sub-analysis showed that cell type (bone-marrow-derived progenitors and mesenchymal stromal cells being most effective) and administration route (intravenous or renal artery injection) were significant predictors of therapeutic efficacy. The timing of therapy in relation to clinical manifestation of disease, and cell origin and dose, were not associated with efficacy. Our meta-analysis confirms that cell-based therapies improve impaired renal function and morphology in preclinical models of CKD. Our analyses can be used to optimise experimental interventions and thus support both improved preclinical research and development of cell-based therapeutic interventions in a clinical setting.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Millipore
Urea solution, suitable for microbiology, 40% in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea-12C, 99.9 atom % 12C
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea solution, 40 % (w/v) in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea solution, BioUltra, ~8 M in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, JIS special grade, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, SAJ first grade, ≥98.0%
Supelco
Urea, 8 M (after reconstitution with 16 mL high purity water)
Urea, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, puriss., meets analytical specification of Ph. Eur., BP, USP, 99.0-100.5%, 99.0-101.0% (calc. on dry substance)
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, BioUltra, for molecular biology, 99% (T)
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, puriss. p.a., ACS reagent, reag. Ph. Eur., ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, BioXtra, pH 7.5-9.5 (20 °C, 5 M in H2O)
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, ReagentPlus®, ≥99.5%, pellets
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, powder, BioReagent, for molecular biology, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, ACS reagent, 99.0-100.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, suitable for electrophoresis
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Creatinine, anhydrous, ≥98%
USP
Urea, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Supelco
Creatinine, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Supelco
Urea, analytical standard