Skip to Content
MilliporeSigma
  • Non-animal photosafety screening for complex cosmetic ingredients with photochemical and photobiochemical assessment tools.

Non-animal photosafety screening for complex cosmetic ingredients with photochemical and photobiochemical assessment tools.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP (2015-06-07)
Hayato Nishida, Morihiko Hirota, Yoshiki Seto, Gen Suzuki, Masashi Kato, Masato Kitagaki, Mariko Sugiyama, Hirokazu Kouzuki, Satomi Onoue
ABSTRACT

Previously, a non-animal screening approach was proposed for evaluating photosafety of cosmetic ingredients by means of in vitro photochemical and photobiochemical assays; however, complex cosmetic ingredients, such as plant extracts and polymers, could not be evaluated because their molecular weight is often poorly defined and so their molar concentration cannot be calculated. The aim of the present investigation was to establish a photosafety screen for complex cosmetic ingredients by using appropriately modified in vitro photosafety assays. Twenty plant extracts were selected as model materials on the basis of photosafety information, and their phototoxic potentials were assessed by means of ultraviolet (UV)/visible light (VIS) spectral analysis, reactive oxygen species (ROS)/micellar ROS (mROS) assays, and 3T3 neutral red uptake phototoxicity testing (3T3 NRU PT). The maximum UV/VIS absorption value was employed as a judgment factor for evaluating photoexcitability of samples, and the value of 1.0 was adopted as a tentative criterion for photosafety identification. The ROS/mROS assays were conducted at 50 μg/mL, and no false negative prediction was obtained. Furthermore, the ROS/mROS assays at 50 μg/mL had a similar predictive capacity to the ROS/mROS assays in the previous study. A systematic tiered approach for simple and rapid non-animal photosafety evaluation of complex cosmetic ingredients can be constructed using these modified in vitro photochemical assays.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
2-Propanol, suitable for HPLC
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, suitable for HPLC
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethanol, ≥99.5%, suitable for absorption spectrum analysis
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethanol, ≥99.5%, suitable for fluorescence
Sigma-Aldrich
Glycerol, JIS special grade, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Glycerol, SAJ first grade, ≥98.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, ≥99.0%, suitable for absorption spectrum analysis
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethanol, ≥99.5%, suitable for HPLC
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
2-Propanol, SAJ first grade, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Benzophenone, SAJ first grade, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
2-Propanol, JIS special grade, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Cetyl alcohol, SAJ special grade, ≥98.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethanol, JIS 300, ≥99.5%, suitable for residue analysis
Sigma-Aldrich
1,2-Propanediol, SAJ first grade, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethanol, JIS 1000, ≥99.5%, suitable for residue analysis
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethanol, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
o-Xylene, SAJ special grade, ≥98.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, JIS special grade, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
DL-Lactic acid, JIS special grade, 85.0-92.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
1,2-Propanediol, SAJ special grade, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethanol, ≥99.5%, SAJ super special grade
Sigma-Aldrich
Dimethyl sulfoxide, SAJ first grade, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
2-Propanol, 99.5%, HPLC grade
Sigma-Aldrich
3-(4-Methylbenzylidene)camphor, ≥98.0% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
1,2-Propanediol, ReagentPlus®, 99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Benzophenone, purified by sublimation, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acridine, ≥96.5% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Lactic acid solution, ACS reagent, ≥85%
Sigma-Aldrich
Glycerol, FCC, FG